Professional workflows

AI for research scientists

Compare methods and findings across papers, map counterevidence and identify research gaps within an explicit search scope.

Open workspaceView plans

From a question to work you can review

Study comparison

Compare design, sample, methods, outcomes, findings and applicability across studies.

Open workspace

Research matrix

Extract consistent fields from each source into an inspectable evidence matrix.

Open workspace

Research gaps

Separate demonstrated gaps from unresolved conflicts and limits of the available search.

Open workspace

A clear review process

Every output separates source findings from synthesis. Search coverage and methodological limits remain visible; no workflow represents a limited search as an exhaustive systematic review.

  1. 1

    Choose the evidence

    Select the documents for this task and define the question, jurisdiction or research scope. Only include material you are authorised to process.

  2. 2

    Inspect the result

    Read the short answer, then check the source references, competing evidence and limitations. A source link is a path to inspection, not a guarantee that a claim is true.

  3. 3

    Prepare the output

    Revise the answer, save the report and export Markdown or DOCX, or use Print / PDF. Preserve the sources and record the human review where required.

European roots. Professional responsibility.

Veritas Ask is developed by MAŃSKI AI s.r.o. in the European Union around a simple principle: a professional answer is more valuable when its evidence, uncertainty and provenance are visible.

Security and data handling