Literature review
Search, organise and synthesise current literature with a reproducible scope and limitations.
VERITAS ACADEMIC
Search, compare, verify and cite. Turn selected papers into a review of methods, conflicting findings and unanswered questions.
For researchers, doctoral students and university teams.
Professional AI you can verify.
Citation checks flag missing or unsupported references. They do not guarantee that a paper or claim is correct.
Illustrative example · fictional documents
Your question
Review these papers and identify areas where the evidence conflicts.
Evidence
The designs support different strengths of inference.
A shared conclusion does not remove the need to compare methods and limitations.
Review before use · Citation checks flag missing or unsupported references. They do not guarantee that a paper or claim is correct.
Sources
Participants were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups.
The observational design cannot establish a causal effect.
An evidence matrix, research gaps and references you can inspect.
Start with your own documentsSearch, organise and synthesise current literature with a reproducible scope and limitations.
Compare design, sample, methods, outcomes, findings and applicability across studies.
Separate demonstrated gaps from unresolved conflicts and limits of the available search.
VERITAS TRUST
Customer Content is not used to train Veritas Ask. Inference, security logging and retention are separate processes governed by the applicable agreement.
Customer Data is stored and processed within the European Union, including AI inference. Detailed infrastructure locations are not published.
The standard service has no exception for routine processing or support outside the EU. Changes require prior agreement and applicable legal safeguards.
Authorised professional work with personal data is permitted under the applicable legal basis and DPA. Sensitive data requires an agreed controlled deployment. Classified information is excluded from the standard service.
Yes. Use the same authorised or anonymised documents and question. Compare source accuracy, missing evidence, uncertainty and the human correction required.
Individual access follows the selected plan and limits. Team plans start at three seats. University and institutional licences require agreed seats, usage and contractual conditions.
EUROPEAN ACADEMIC PRINCIPLES FOR AI
In developing Veritas Academic, we take into account the direction and recurring principles reflected in the work and initiatives of leading European university networks — EUA, EURASHE, CESAER and UNICA — including responsible AI use, human oversight, academic and research integrity, transparency, data protection, AI literacy and institutional responsibility.
AI should serve the needs and values of universities. EUA highlights ethics, institutional strategy, education and AI literacy, regulation and sustainability as key considerations when universities adopt AI.
A practical and responsible approach to introducing AI into higher education, understanding European regulation and enabling institutions to use AI in ways that are legally and institutionally manageable.
Trustworthy and human-centred AI, research integrity, transparency, data protection and human oversight. CESAER also highlights the importance of trusted tools and a strong European technological environment.
An “AI-ready” university needs to use AI responsibly across teaching, research and institutional operations while understanding its capabilities, limitations and risks.
We translate these principles into the way Veritas Academic works: verifiable sources, visible uncertainty, human review, customer data storage and processing within the European Union, including AI inference and no training of Veritas Ask on customer content.
Veritas Ask is developed by MAŃSKI AI s.r.o. in the European Union around a simple principle: a professional answer is more valuable when its evidence, uncertainty and provenance are visible.
Check sources, uncertainty, missing information and the work needed to reach a usable result.
Discuss your deploymentBring a real question. Use authorised documents. Compare the result.